An unlawfully obtained vs. unlawfully taken evidence in civil litigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.9Keywords:
evidence, unlawful evidence, proportionality testAbstract
The academic paper analyses some interpretation problems associated with assessing unlawful evidence. In current legal practice, one of the most significant and debated issues in court proceedings is handling the evidence obtained. This question is all the more complex when the court finds itself in a situation where it has to decide on the admissibility and relevance of the evidence obtained unlawfully. A pressing question then is: How should the court deal with evidence obtained in violation of the law? Is it possible for such evidence to be recognised as admissible and to influence the decision on the merits, or is it the court's duty to reject such evidence unreservedly?
References
Čentík, T. (2024). On admissibility of unlawful evidence under the CoCL (2024, May 23). Available at: https://www.ulpianus.sk/blog/k-pripustnosti-nezakonnych-dokazov-podla-csp
Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic case ref. II. ÚS 1774/14, of December 09, 2014.
Gešková, K. (2024). Unlawful evidence in civil process. (2024, May 23). Available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.flaw.uniba.sk/fileadmin/praf/Veda/Konferencie_a_podujatia/4th_Session.pdf
Šamko, P. (2024). Unlawful and unusable evidence. (2024, May 23). Available at: http://www.pravnelisty.sk/clanky/a321-nezakonne-a-nepouzitelne-dokazy (link valid as of January 28, 2022).
Act No. 160/2015 Coll. of the Slovak Republic. Statutes Code of Civil Litigation Procedure, as amended.
Števček, M. et al. (2022). Civil law procedural. Introduction to the civil procedure and litigation. 1st ed. Prague : C.H. Beck. (632 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-876-4.
Števček, M., Ficová, S., Baricová, J. et al. (2016). Code of Civil Litigation Procedure. Commentary. 1st edition. Prague : C. H. Beck, (1544 p.) ISBN 978-80-7400-629-6.
Čentík, T. (2024). On admissibility of unlawful evidence under the CoCL. (2024, May 23). Available at: https://www.ulpianus.sk/blog/k-pripustnosti-nezakonnych-dokazov-podla-csp
Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic case ref. IV. ÚS 492/2012, of April 18, 2013.
Kampera, J. & Macháčová, P. (2019). Kampera, J. & Macháčová, P. (2019). Přípustnost nezákonně získaných důkazů v civilním řízení okem Nejvyššího a Ústavního soudu (Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in civil proceedings by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court). Available at: https://www.epravo.cz/top/clanky/pripustnost-nezakonne-ziskanych-dukazu-v-civilnim-rizeni-okem-nejvyssiho-a-ustavniho-soudu-109476.html
Verdict of the Czech Supreme Court, case ref. 21 Cdo 1267/2018-113 of August 14, 2018. Available at:
RELEVANS (2019). Execution of unlawfully obtained evidence in civil proceedings. (2024, May 23). Available at: https://www.relevans.sk/vykonanienezakonneziskanehodokazuvcivilnomkonani/.
Smolková, S., & Dzimko, J. (2022). Dôkaz získaný nezákonným spôsobom v civilnom konaní. In Právne rozpravy on-screen III.: sekcia súkromného práva : zborník z online vedeckej konferencie konanej dňa 7.5.2021 na Právnickej fakulte Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici. Právne rozpravy on-screen III. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici - Belianum. https://doi.org/10.24040/pros.07.05.2021.ssp.209-219
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iveta Lajošová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.