Judicial and legal concentration of proceedings in the context of evidence-taking

Iveta Lajošová

doi:10.5219/legestic.10

Authors

Iveta Lajošová Matej Bel University, Faculty of Law, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Tel.: +421 917841830

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.10

Keywords:

concentration, legal concentration, judicial concentration

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of judicial and legal concentration of proceedings, particularly focusing on evidence taking. The principle of concentration of proceedings, which aims to optimize procedural steps, is central to this study. By ensuring that all relevant objections, evidence, and arguments are presented at a predetermined stage of the process—whether by statutory requirements or judicial discretion—the principle seeks to enhance procedural efficiency and fairness. The paper examines both statutory concentration, mandated by law, and judicial concentration, applied at the judge's discretion. The analysis explores how these mechanisms contribute to the procedural economy, prevent unnecessary delays, and motivate litigating parties to fulfill their procedural duties promptly. Furthermore, the paper discusses the historical development of concentration principles in Slovak law, the impact on procedural obligations, and the balance between procedural strictness and flexibility. The findings highlight the importance of concentration in achieving timely and effective judicial rulings while maintaining the legal guarantees of a fair trial.

References

Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic file ref. I. ÚS 33/2021, dated 26/01/2021.

Act No. 160/2015 Coll. Of the Slovak Republic. Statutes Code of Civil Litigation Procedure, as amended.

Ruling of the Regional Court in Žilina, case ref. 14Cob/89/2020 of October 28, 2020.

Act No. 160/2015 Coll. Of the Slovak Republic. Statutes Code of Civil Litigation Procedure, as amended.

Resolution of the Regional Court in Košice, case ref. 11Co/276/2019 of August 24, 2020.

ŠTEVČEK, M. et al. Civil law procedural. Introduction to the civil procedure and litigation. 1st ed. Prague : C.H. Beck. 2022. 632 p. ISBN 978-80-7400-876-4.

Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic file ref. II. ÚS 530/2018, dated 05/11/2018.

Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic file ref. III. ÚS 757/2017-48, dated 13/11/2018.

Števček, M. et al. (2022). Civil law procedural. Introduction to the civil procedure and litigation. 1st ed. Prague : C.H. Beck. (632 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-876-4.

Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic file ref. II. ÚS 530/2018, dated 05/11/2018.

Ruling of the Regional Court in Prešov, case ref. 20Co/155/2018 of September 26, 2019.

Števček, M., Ficová, S., Baricová, J. (2016). Code of Civil Litigation. Commentary. Prague : C. H. Beck, (1544 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-629-6.

Števček, M. et al. (2022). Civil law procedural. Introduction to the civil procedure and litigation. 1st ed. Prague : C.H. Beck. (632 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-876-4.

Act No. 160/2015 Coll. Of the Slovak Republic. Statutes Code of Civil Litigation Procedure, as amended.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic case ref. 7 Cdo/45/2020, dated 30/06/2022.

Finding of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic case ref. II. ÚS 168/2019, dated 21/11/2019.

Števček, M., Ficová, S., Baricová, J. et al. (2016). Code of Civil Litigation. Commentary. Prague : C. H. Beck, (1544 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-629-6.

Števček, M. et al. (2022). Civil law procedural. Introduction to the civil procedure and litigation. 1st ed. Prague : C.H. Beck. (632 p.). ISBN 978-80-7400-876-4.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic, case ref. 7Cdo 1/2018 of March 21, 2018.