Legal union of a same-sex couple in the Slovak Republic and the scope of recognition of such unions validly established abroad

Authors

  • Veronika Václavová Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica Faculty of Law, Komenského 20, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic Tel.: +421 911 673 423

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.7

Keywords:

registered partnership, same-sex couple, marriage, homoparentality, discrimination

Abstract

The paper focuses on the issue of legal regulation of unions of same-sex couples under the conditions of the Slovak legal order. The author notes that within the Slovak Republic there is no equivalent of the institution of marriage for cohabiting persons of the same sex. It is further specified on the issues of recognition of marriages of same-sex couples, respectively registered partnerships established abroad. The aim of the contribution is to summarize and stimulate a wider discussion on the issues addressed and to point out the fact that human rights must be guaranteed in a state of law, while their guarantee can be interpreted as a security granted to all and the rejection of discrimination. The lack of legal recognition for same-sex unions not only presents social challenges but also practical hindrances in daily affairs such as healthcare, taxation, and social security benefits, which can often be predicated on marital status. It is crucial to consider the implications of such legal gaps on the well-being of individuals who are part of same-sex couples, as well as their children. The evolving social fabric and changing attitudes towards same-sex relationships necessitate a reassessment of existing legal frameworks to ensure inclusivity and equality under the law. The continued efforts and discussions within the Slovak Republic highlight a growing awareness and potential for legislative change that aligns with the European consensus on human rights. Moreover, the exploration of legal avenues for recognition of same-sex unions must consider the dynamic nature of family structures in the contemporary context, where diversity in family units is becoming increasingly normative.

References

Sobotková, I. (2012) Psychology of family. 2nd ed. Prague: Portal, 2012.

Pavelková, B., Kubíčková, G., Čečotová, V.: Family Law. Commentary with jurisprudence. Hureka, 2005, 13 p.

Sekerák, M., & Novotný, L. (2021). Legislation on Same-Sex Partnerships in the Post-Communist Area: Case Study of the Czech Republic. In Review of Central and East European Law (Vol. 46, Issues 3–4, pp. 374–399). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10054

Gherghina, S., & Silagadze, N. (2021). Selective Equality: Social Democratic Parties and the Referendums on Same-Sex Marriage in Eastern Europe. In Europe-Asia Studies (Vol. 74, Issue 1, pp. 140–158). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1902481

Sekerák, M. (2017). Same-Sex Marriages (or Civil Unions/Registered Partnerships) in Slovak Constitutional Law: Challenges and possibilities. In Utrecht Law Review (Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 34). Utrecht University School of Law. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.340

Tománek, P.: Heteronormality in relation to socialization and adoption of children by homosexual parents. In: Lifelong Learning – celoživotní vzdělávaní (vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 215).

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Fedotová and others against Russia of July 13, 2021, complaint no. 40792/10

The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria of 24 June 2010, complaint no. 30141/04, decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Vallianatos and others v. Greece dated November 13, 2013, complaint no. 29381/09 and complaint no. 32684/09

European Parliament: European Union an ‘‘LGBTIQ Freedom Zone’’, [online]. [quoted. 2022.10.09.], available on the Internet: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210304IPR99219/parliament-declares-the-european-union-an-lgbtiq-freedom-zone

European Parliament: Same-sex marriages and partnerships should be recognized, , [online]. [quoted. 2022.10.09.], available on the Internet: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210910IPR11913/same-sex-marriages-and-partnerships-should-be-recognised-across -the-eu

Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case of Coman and Hamilton v. Romania dated June 5, 2018, no. complaint C-673/16.

Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Lounes case, dated November 14, 2017, no. complaints C-165/16.

Král, R. (2019). What does the controversial judgment of the ECJ in the Coman case actually bring? In: Jurisprudence, (Vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 41-42).

Patakyová, M. (2023). Activity of the Public Defender of Rights during the term of office 2017-2022, p. 18

Onačilla, J. (2023). Permanent residence for same-sex couples, [online]. [quoted: 2023.12.06.], available on the Internet: https://www.pravnenoviny.sk/trvaly-pobyt-pre-pary-rovnakeho-pohlavia

Downloads

Published

07-03-2024

How to Cite

Václavová, V. (2024). Legal union of a same-sex couple in the Slovak Republic and the scope of recognition of such unions validly established abroad. Legestic, 2, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5219/legestic.7

Issue

Section

Articles